Venezuela has the largest proven oil reserves in the world. It was once so rich that Concorde used to fly from Caracas to Paris. But in the last three years its economy has collapsed. Hunger has gripped the nation for years. Now, it’s killing people and animals that are dying of starvation. The Venezuelan government knows, but won’t admit it!!! Four in five Venezuelans live in poverty. People queue for hours to buy food. Much of the time they go without. People are also dying from a lack of medicines. Inflation is at 82,766% and there are warnings it could exceed one million per cent by the end of this year. Venezuelans are trying to get out. The UN says 2.3 million people have fled the country - 7% of the population.

Monday, September 5, 2011

The Devil and Demian Bichir

By ALEX KUCZYNSKI

You can learn a lot about a man by the way he disembowels an avocado.

Demian Bichir, the Mexican film star, stood in my kitchen at lunchtime testing the pile of avocados on the counter. He wanted to make guacamole the way he used to as a busboy at Rosa Mexicano in the 1980s, during his first sustained lap as an actor in the United States. Instead of a contrived lunch date at a restaurant, digital recorders whirring, he decided to come over to my apartment with a bottle of Patrón tequila and his hands ready for cooking.

I had prepared the molcajete, the traditional Mexican version of a mortar and pestle, and gathered the onions, cilantro, tomatoes, jalapeños, avocados and habaneros. (“Habaneros?” he said. “If you want to kill somebody.”) I stashed the tequila in the freezer.

“This one doesn’t feel right,” he said, touching an avocado’s papery skin. “But this guy, and this guy” — he reached for another and, squinting, palmed the fruit as gently as if it were a bird’s egg ready to hatch — “and this guy are perfect.” Within a second, a six-inch Wüsthof cook’s knife had sliced the avocado in half and Bichir, looking into my eyes, brought down the knife into the palm of his hand with a thwap.

Oh, God. Do we call an ambulance?

No. Locking the pit onto the blade of the knife, he worked it free in a deft corkscrew motion, accompanying his Kabuki with sound effects. “Poom, poom, poom. Whish.” He cross-hatched each side — “pap, pap, pap” — and spooned out the perfect square chunks into the molcajete.

Delicacy, precision, startling force: these are qualities that defined Bichir’s performance in “A Better Life,” a remarkable film that has cemented his reputation as a formidable talent in Hollywood. A household name in Mexico for two decades, he has become familiar to American audiences in recent years as Fidel Castro in Steven Soderbergh’s “Che” and as the brutally handsome, morally Manichean mayor of Tijuana and husband to Mary-Louise Parker in Showtime’s totally twisted, insanely entertaining Emmy-winning series “Weeds.”

The son of a Mexican theater director and an actress, Bichir is one of three acting brothers — Odiseo, Demian and Bruno— so famous for their prolific output that in 2003 the Mexican MTV Movie Awards created the category “Best Bichir in a Movie.” (Demian won.) He grew up in the barrios of Mexico City, poor but surrounded by books. “My parents met in the theater, and they grew up loving theater, and when my brothers and I decided to become actors, we had all we needed in our library at home,” he said.


Everett Collection
Bichir as an undocumented gardener in Chris Weitz’s new film, “A Better Life.”
In “A Better Life,” Bichir is Carlos Galindo, an illegal immigrant from Mexico who scrapes out an existence as a gardener, peering in at an American dream of swimming pools, housekeepers and big cars in the Hollywood Hills. When Carlos’s sister lends him enough money to buy a truck, which would catapult him from day laborer to gardening boss, he hesitates: she hasn’t told her husband she has taken the money out of their savings account. And there is so much more at stake. Carlos has no driver’s license, so being pulled over means instant arrest, deportation and separation from his son, whom he has raised as a single father.

He buys the truck; the next day, in an act of insidious betrayal, it is stolen. One of the tougher scenes to watch is one in which Carlos stands on a busy street, his work clothes briny with sweat, his eyes fruitlessly searching the traffic for his truck — the dream that will rescue him and his child from their gang-controlled East L.A. barrio, that will allow them to live in a house with more than one bed and one sofa. His eyes alight on a police officer, yet he can’t ask for help. In Bichir’s face, we see that Carlos knows his situation is utterly futile, and he and his child are vulnerable. The sense of despair and desperation is all-encompassing.


Bichir calls it one of the most important works of his career, “and for an actor,” he added, “the character of Carlos Galindo has the same dimension and depth as Lear or Hamlet — it’s that powerful.” When he first met with Chris Weitz — whose grandmother Lupita Tovar was perhaps Mexico’s most famous actress — the director told Bichir that he was not going to make an overtly political film, but that he would set out to present a simple, powerful story that happened to have as one of its themes the Mexican immigrant experience.

“I didn’t see any gimmicks, any Hollywood tricks,” Bichir said. “I need to be moved and for something to speak to me truthfully.”

While the movie is political, certainly, Weitz (director of “About a Boy,” “The Golden Compass” and “The Twilight Saga: New Moon”) chose to tell the story of Carlos Galindo as a piece of social realism, rather than as political propaganda. However, as Weitz told me, “the moment you train a camera on someone, especially a film camera, you say they are worthy of being paid attention to, and it elicits sympathy. In that regard, the film is political by default.” But he chose not to push that button too hard and risk “turning Carlos into a symbol rather than a closely observed character,” he said. In that sense, “A Better Life” is a story about the delicate relationship between a father and son, about loss of culture, about isolation, about the spiritual lives of two nations.

Bichir moved to New York when he was 22. “My mother said, ‘What? You can’t move there! They shoot people at 2 o’clock in the afternoon! Oh my God!’ ” He auditioned at Lee Strasberg and was told he was already an actor and he should save the $5,000 tuition. “And that’s when I stopped acting,” he said. “I wanted to give my actor a break. I wanted to live and to learn English. I wanted to be anything, a cabdriver, a busboy, anything to keep me away from acting for a while.”

Thus, his stretch as a busboy at Rosa Mexicano, where his job included making guacamole in front of each customer’s table. “I think I still hold the record for making 39 guacamoles in one lunch,” he said. Then on to Los Angeles, where he spent four years going on auditions and trying to land a role. “Nothing happened,” he said. “It was hard, really hard.” When he was offered a role in “Hasta Morir,” he took it, returning to Mexico, where he won an Ariel, the Mexican equivalent of an Oscar.

In Mexico, he worked all the time. “And then one day, I was about 41, and I pictured my life,” he said. “Soon, I would be living in a house with a big swimming pool, drinking a bloody mary and thinking, what if I had tried a little harder? Been a little more adventurous? Tried a little longer?” Divorced, with no attachments, he moved back to L.A. “Something had fundamentally changed in me, in my hard drive.”

While serving on the jury at the Ibiza Film Festival, he got a call at 5 in the morning from Steven Soderbergh, who asked him to play Castro in his biopic about Che Guevara. “And that was when it all began,” he said. “That was when everything changed.”

I first met Bichir before a screening of “A Better Life” in New York. Slender, animated, almost impish, his green eyes alight, he reminded me of a self-effacing Fred Astaire. “I’m writing a serious piece about you,” I said. “Because I’m — such—_ a serious actor?” Each word dropped with a beat of expert comic timing, as if to say: I. Am. Not. A. Serious. Actor. Lady. Get. A. Life.

As the film began, I couldn’t place the man I had just met on the screen. The wiry, bright-eyed comic in the lobby was replaced by a heavyset man whose face had been eaten away by weariness and fear, his eyes dull, the barest flicker of light left in them to suggest his soul was still alive way down inside.

Bichir is somewhat of a Method actor: he immersed himself in a life like Galindo’s by driving a gardener’s truck — which he bought off the street from some paisanos — wearing the same unwashed clothes for days, sleeping four hours a night. One of the film’s producers told me that two Mexicans spotted Bichir in L.A., in his gardener’s truck and shook their heads, saying, “Look, man! That’s Demian Bichir. He’s sure fallen on hard times.”

Yet he has such a light, comic gift, it was hard to watch him make guacamole and think that this was the same man who so brilliantly captured Castro’s threatening physicality, the curlicued accent, the voice veering from thunderous to almost ethereal, the powder-keg personality. Difficult to imagine this funny guy dancing salsa in my kitchen to Akwid’s “California” (a song from the soundtrack to “A Better Life”) as the gangster mayor who orders murders and makes a point to his pregnant girlfriend by basically raping her over his desk.

“It is extraordinary, Demian’s vitality in contrast to the performance he gives,” Weitz said. “All of the energy goes underground.” Benicio del Toro, who worked with Bichir on “Che,” describes him as one of the strongest actors he’s worked with. For the part of Castro, del Toro said, Soderbergh “needed someone who was strong but not someone who looked like he was acting strong. And that is kind of hard to find. Pacino can be strong without acting strong. Hoffman, too. Bichir has that quality, that gravitas.”

“We all have that capacity, to be two things,” Bichir said. “And after all I was named for both the devil and the angel. Demonio y angel. Dem-y-an.” (His parents took his name from the Herman Hesse novel “Demian: The Story of Emil Sinclair’s Youth.”)

Oliver Stone was drawn to the demonic side, and cast Bichir as a huckster in his next movie, “Savages,” based on a Don Winslow novel about pot growers and Mexican drug cartels. “He can play heavy,” Stone said, adding that “all he needs is one big role as a narcotraficante and if he hits that note just right he will have a worldwide reputation in a second.”


Everett Collection
Bichir in his role as a drug dealer and mayor of Tijuana in “Weeds.”
Mary-Louise Parker, who played his lover and then wife on “Weeds,” also believes he plays good guys, like Carlos Galindo, with an almost sacred perfection. “I might use a word that sounds pretentious, but his performance was almost holy,” she said. “It was beyond being just about depth. He made the film into a Greek tragedy. And he is one of the few actors I know who could make that part humane.” And this from a woman who broke her toe during their first, unexpectedly vigorous love scene. “He is pretty delicious,” she added.

Bichir is dating but admits he is “really bad at long-term commitments.” He did become a father in May; the child is the product of a brief — “and beautiful, please, beautiful, beautiful” — romance in Spain last year. “I try to be as clear as I can be,” he said. “I don’t hide or play stupid games. I try to let everyone know that eventually I will probably be leaving.” In this case, a couple of months after his leave-taking, he got an e-mail informing him he would be a father. Bichir attended the baby’s birth, and she has his surname. “I decided to be there and not run away from the situation. I am her father, and I will love her forever,” he said.

At 48, Bichir feels as if he has experienced a kind of rebirth. “It is a before-and-after moment, for sure,” he said. After the meal and almost an entire bottle of tequila, we were looking out at the city. It was late afternoon. His roles as Castro, as Carlos Galindo and as Miguel Hidalgo in a Mexican production out this year about the country’s founder, are the work he is proudest of. “It would be sad,” he said, “if my best work had been 20 years ago and now I only had memories.”

He also makes great guacamole.

Thanks NY Times

Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Summer Blockbusted 2011: Studios Still Sinking Too Much into Sequels...

Summer Blockbusted 2011: Studios Still Sinking Too Much into Sequels

By: Simon Brookfield | 08.31.11 (10:28 AM) | (27) Comments

So how does this "toss money at the problem" phenomenon stack up to last year? Back on an eve of August in 2010, as the summer movie season was nearing its annual stage of hibernation, I felt a burning necessity – more than any year before – to delve deep into the often perplexing machine that is Hollywood and why, perpetually, they expect bundles of cash tossed at the silver screen will not only yield a product that audiences will adore, but will line the pockets of executives in turn.

It was becoming clear that the surges in summer sequels was beginning to wear on the average moviegoer. Returns dipped sharply from their predecessors in almost every instance and reviews were consistently middling. Now in 2011, adding another level of intrigue to the collective performance of the films across the hottest months of the year was the rapidly expanding importance of the international market and the gargantuan surge in 3-D offerings.

A year ago, as Iron Man 2 blasted its way to number one at the box office with a sizzling $128-million opening, many were nevertheless feeling the effects of a lackluster first four months at the cinema, and as August rolled around studios twiddled their thumbs nervously as they witnessed attendance plummeting to new lows.

This summer the gap has only widened. May seemed to offer a revival, posting the best month of all time with $1.037 billion in combined revenues, above 2010`s which ranked seventh. June, however, saw its grosses dive to fifth; July a solid bump thanks to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 and Transformers: Dark of the Moon and August was met with atrocious returns not even registering in the top 10 (even 1999’s proceeds rank seventh).

As I iterated in last year's piece, which you can read here, it is this ebb in profit that spurs studios to search for a way to fill seats and excite the masses, which, sadly, equates to injecting pictures with larger doses of cash, slapping on an extra dimension and watering down ideas with effects and flashy action. But I do digress, as FX and money do not by any means have to equate to an inferior product, evidenced by Inception last year and “Harry Potter,” Rise of the Planet of the Apes and X-Men: First Class this summer. GCI can enhance a strong script — a filmmaking staple all too rare in this modern blockbuster age.


The budget of a film is spread throughout a number of principle expenses including the story rights, the screenplay, producers, directors, actors, visual effects, music and the actual production costs. Higher profile filmmakers and thespians can demand upwards of $20 million plus a percentage of final receipts. Depending on the type of film being produced, the visual effects allocation can balloon towards $100 million alone.

Without delving into the drier technical aspects regarding tax breaks, co-productions between studios and joint distribution projects, the rule of thumb is that if a film’s gross equals its negative cost it has shown a profit. Meaning, that after the sum of the production budget is tallied, a film must double that amount to become profitable; $100 million total budget, $200 million final gross, etc. This equates to the big name production houses such as Fox and Paramount, to name a few, receiving roughly half of the ultimate sum and after having potentially sunk years into a film, receiving $100 million on a budget of the same (a.k.a. breaking even) does not look good when it comes to the annual report.

So how does this “toss money at the problem” phenomenon stack up to last year? Well, a small miracle to be found is that we have had the same number of films costing $100 million-plus in 2011 as we did last summer, 14, but with one more movie exceeding the whooping $200-million cost mark. Taking inflation out of the equation to keep things simpler, as we rounded into the aughties we had less than one third as many flicks carrying monster budgets and all of those became thundering successes. The “re” craze (remake, reimagining, reboot) coupled with sequel fever also maintained its stranglehold on the industry, seeing those phenomena rise from a combined two in summer 2000 and 2001, to 13 in each 2009 and 2010 up to a whopping 17 over just four months this year.

Following the success – I use the word success as the English language has not yet invented a word to justifiably express the James Cameron phenomenon – of Avatar, 3D has run rampant over Hollywood as a means to curb these ballooning costs and lack of audience interest. But as irony would have it, those crafty viewers quickly caught on to the game.


As the first weekend of May usually would demand it, things debuted with a bang as Marvel’s Thor took number one with $65.7 million; a gross achieved thanks to a 60 percent share in 3-D screens. From then on, audiences clung to their money for dear life as only 45 percent came from the extra dimension for “Pirates 4,” Kung Fu Panda 2, and Green Lantern. Cars 2 sank to 40 percent, but things peaked with “Transformers 3” before sinking to summer low of 38 percent with Captain America: The First Avenger. I could mention a late summer surge from Final Destination 5, Conan the Barbarian and Fright Night, but that would be ever the moot point as they all ranged from disappointments to mammoth flops anyways.

This attempt to traverse the chasm left by greatly shrinking attendance was met with failure in North America as two sequels, “Potter” and Fast Five, saw their grosses rise above that of their predecessor and only one, all summer, witnessed a gain in attendance and that is the aforementioned oddball smash Fast Five. To date this year, the U.S. and Canada have only produced five $200 million-plus grossers and but two exceeding $300 million. Even the poor showing of 2010 had 10 of the former by the end of January and four of the latter; I would say Christmas season had better be a strong one. Oh, and did I mention we have only a sole $100 million-plus opener thus far when last year had four to its name by New Years?


Glancing worldwide, however, reveals a vastly different tale ripe with hints at how the global film industry will be shaped over the next decade. Three movies (“Potter,” “Dark of the Moon” and “Pirates 4”) have broken the billion-dollar threshold, but garnered a respective 71 percent, 68 percent and 77 percent from international markets, which leaves the stateside receipts in their proverbial dust. Expanding to the top 10 worldwide grosses of 2011 thus far, even the lowest share from overseas is still 56 percent from The Hangover: Part II and stretching further yet, the 23 of the top 50 films of the year that premiered in summer averaged 51.5 percent overseas take, and without American comedies, the share widened to 59 percent.

Numbers may be the foundation of Hollywood, but I will retreat with my barrage for now. Down to the simple and true point: the movies are dying and ironically it is the season of big-budget fun. What once was the time of year that used to regularly invigorate, is now ultimately leading us down a black hole of rehashed ideas, money-grubbing gimmicks and soulless, empty shells of what used to be considered fun. As much as it may seem contradictory to the way things have been progressing over the past 10-20 years, cinema enthusiasts and average Joe movie-goer will turn out for a superior product even if you pocket that extra $50 million for a few smaller films at another date. I do not want the remaining energy of blockbuster season drained and replaced by the serious and oft pretentious nature of awards season by any means; that already has its place on the cinematic landscape. All I want and all we need is “progress” kept in check and the focal point of the summer months to be balanced between the desire to turn out a quality project and stuff one's mattress with green.


Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Hulu to Launch in Japan...

UPDATED: Content deal includes "CSI" franchise and marks the streaming firm's first overseas expansion.

TOKYO – Hulu will launch its first international operations with a subscription service in Japan, offering streaming of CBS shows, such as CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, CSI Miami, CSINY, NICS and 90210, under a content deal with CBS Corp..

'Modern Family' creator: Why I took on Hulu

Analyst: Selling Hulu Would Be `a Mistake of Epic Proportions' for Entertainment Giants
The ad-free service will allow unlimited access to movies and a library of shows, including Numb3rs, Star Trek and Twin Peaks, for 1,480 yen ($19) per month from web-connected TVs, game consoles, Blu-ray players, smartphones, tablets and PC's "With the launch in Japan, Hulu is focused on adding meaningfully to the entertainment choices available to Japanese consumers, while providing a valuable new channel for distribution, increased consumer reach and incremental monetization for our premium content partners," said Johannes Larcher, SVP of international for Hulu.

Hulu announced in August that its first overseas operation would be in Japan, and opened an office in Tokyo, though no further details were given at the time.

"We're thrilled to have CBS's world class content be part of Hulu's first international market and their new venture in Japan," said Armando Nuñez, president, CBS Studios International.

Thank you Hollywood Reporter

Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Zediva to Appeal Hollywood Injunction to Ninth Circuit...

Zediva, the online movie streaming service that made waves earlier this year by "renting" recently-released movies to customers, has officially provided notice that it is going to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals with hopes of overturning a preliminary injunction that suspended its operations.

In August, Hollywood studios successfully obtained that injunction by arguing that Zediva's service constituted an illegal public exhibition of its copyrighted material.

Zediva countered that it was engaged in private exhibitions of movies merely intended to offer the public a more convenient way to view them. Zediva allowed its customers to rent both DVDs and DVD players from afar and remotely control each over the Internet, arguing the method of delivery was similar to putting a "longer cable" between a DVD player and individual viewers.
California federal judge John F. Walter rejected that view. In his order, the judge agreed with the studios that Zediva needs the permission of copyright holders to operate its service.
The company is now reaching for a higher authority to determine whether its service is consistent with US copyright law. On Wednesday, Zediva provided notice that it was appealing.
Meanwhile, the MPAA is still looking to spread news about its success.

On Thursday, attorneys for the movie studio asked Judge Walter to consider publishing his injunction order in the Federal Register so that other judges around the nation currently overseeing Internet copyright cases would have the benefit of seeing what they believe to be an astute analysis of the "transmit" clause in the Copyright Act and what it means for Internet streaming transmissions to be "to the public" under the clause. The plaintiffs also say they would be more than happy to submit the judge's opinion on his behalf to the Westlaw database.
Meanwhile, Zediva has really suspended shop, telling customers on its website that the company is "having to lay off our DVD-changing monkeys."

Those monkeys were unavailable for comment. At least one is thinking about filing a wrongful termination action. A few are planning a rebellion against their evil human overlords. The others are busy on typewriters reproducing that long-rumored Shakespeare sonnet.

Thank you Hollywood Reporter

Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Italy's Smallest Region Announces First Film Fund...

Valle d'Aosta will begin with $860,000 in funding in hopes of drawing more projects to the area.
VENICE – Valle d'Aosta, Italy's smallest and least populated region, on Friday announced the creation of the region's first ever film fund, starting out with €600,000 ($860,000) in funding in hopes of drawing more film projects to the region's castles, archeological sites and panoramic vistas.

Darren Aronofsky Kicks Off Venice Film Festival With Off-Color Joke

Venice Film Festival Day 2: Roman Polanski and Madonna's Films Screen

Venice Film Festival Day 3: Viggo Mortensen Plays Freud; Kate Winslet Honored
The announcement was made at the Venice Film Festival, at the Venice Days sidebar event.
PHOTOS: Venice Film Festival: 10 Movies to Know
Organizers said the fund will back film projects from Italian and international companies filming in the region or for independent companies headquartered there. In addition to providing access to funds, the Film Commission Valle d'Aosta will help filmmakers with other projects, such as scouting locations and locating local staff.
The region is the smallest in Italy in terms of geography, and with a population of just 130,000 is also has fewer in inhabitants than any other region. It is also the only Italian region where French is an official language.
"We're a little late getting into the film commission business," said commission president Luciano Barisone. "But that's not necessarily a disadvantage because we can learn from what other commissions have done. And we do think we have some advantages over other regional film funds."
The region, nestled in the Alps in the northwestern corner of Italy, where it borders both Switzerland and France, is mostly bilingual, between Italian and French, and because of that link between the two cultures, film commission officials say they hope to set themselves up as a popular destination for both Italian and French filmmakers as well as those from other countries. Organizers said that if the initiative proves successful the budget could rise in the future.

Thank you Hollywood Reporter

Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Cable operator Mediacom blasts FCC...

A major cable operator has blasted the Federal Communications Commission
for not taking an active role in trying to keep programming costs down.
>
> In a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Rocco Commisso, the
> chairman and chief executive of Mediacom, a New York-based cable operator
> with about 1.14 million subscribers in 22 states, criticized the regulatory
> agency for not being aggressive in trying to keep programming costs down.
>
> "I am deeply disappointed with the Commission's lack of interest in keeping
> multichannel television services affordable," Commisso wrote. "Content
> owners have been unwilling to exercise the slightest measure of
> self-restraint, and are emboldened by the Commission's unwillingness to even
> try to impose some limits or speak out against programmers' practices."
>
> Commisso said that by not acting, the FCC has "cost Americans billions of
> dollars, as programming owners have increased their rates well in excess of
> inflation."
>
> Much of Commisso's beef is about having to pay broadcasters more in
> so-called retransmission consent fees to retransmit their local television
> stations.
>
> "It is especially shameful that retransmission consent fees have
> dramatically increased even as movies and sports events migrate from
> broadcast channels to pay networks and broadcast stations severely cut staff
> and budgets for news and public affairs programming," Commisso said.
>
> The veteran cable executive is also upset with the way cable programmers
> bundle their popular and unpopular channel together so distributors have to
> carry them all on the most widely distributed programming tiers.
>
> "Subscribers are forced to pay for channels they do not want," Commisso
> told the FCC.
>
> Commisso said the growing cost of programming is hurting Genachowski's
> efforts to provide broadband to low-income homes and that a "digital divide"
> is being created as prices rise "beyond the means or more and more
> Americans."
>
> Remedies Commisso pitched include designing an a la carte system that would
> give consumers more control over what channels they get. He also wants more
> transparency, including the ability to require broadcasters and cable
> networks to make public what they charge distributors to carry their
> channels.
>
> "Right now I'm just a collection agency for the programming community,"
> Commissio said in an interview. "We take the brunt of the criticism because
> we send the bill to the consumer."
>
> Thank you Hollywood Reporter
>
Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Friday, September 2, 2011

Netflix Price Increases Take Effect yesterday...

Customers who use streaming video and get DVDs by mail may see 60 percent price hikes.
Netflix's long-planned price changes went into effect today, meaning the company's many customers who subscribe to the $9.99 a month plan for one DVD and unlimited streaming will be seeing a 60 percent price increase.
OUR EDITOR RECOMMENDS

'Mad Men' Begins Streaming on Netflix

4 Ways Amazon vs. Netflix is Good

In July, Netflix announced it was phasing out the $9.99 a month plan in favor of two separate plans: one for unlimited streaming for $7.99 a month and one for one DVD at a time for $7.99 a month. Customers were notified by e-mail that unless they actively made a change to their subscriptions before September 1, they would be enrolled in both plans.
A survey in July of nearly 1100 Netflix users by Wedbush Securities found that 22 percent planned to cancel their Netflix subscriptions and migrate to Hulu, Redbox and Amazon's streaming video service.

Other companies that have been struggling recently, like Blockbuster, are jumping at the chance to scoop up new customers. The company sent out taunting tweets such as "Dear Netflix, we're offering special prices & 30-day trials of Blockbuster Total Access to your members."
And rumors abound that Amazon, which bought the European version of Netflix, called Lovefilm, at the beginning of 2011, may be planning to migrate the service into the U.S. sometime soon.
It's still too early to tell how Netflix's price hike will affect the company, but comments like this one from @eliasdylan may leave executives nervous: "After 5 yrs I have canceled the disc part of my #netflix account. Don't think streaming will live up to Blu-Ray. Might cancel all next month."

Thank you Hollywood Reporter


Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Cable operator Mediacom blasts FCC...

A major cable operator has blasted the Federal Communications Commission for not taking an active role in trying to keep programming costs down.

In a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Rocco Commisso, the chairman and chief executive of Mediacom, a New York-based cable operator with about 1.14 million subscribers in 22 states, criticized the regulatory agency for not being aggressive in trying to keep programming costs down.

"I am deeply disappointed with the Commission's lack of interest in keeping multichannel television services affordable," Commisso wrote. "Content owners have been unwilling to exercise the slightest measure of self-restraint, and are emboldened by the Commission's unwillingness to even try to impose some limits or speak out against programmers' practices."

Commisso said that by not acting, the FCC has "cost Americans billions of dollars, as programming owners have increased their rates well in excess of inflation."

Much of Commisso's beef is about having to pay broadcasters more in so-called retransmission consent fees to retransmit their local television stations.

"It is especially shameful that retransmission consent fees have dramatically increased even as movies and sports events migrate from broadcast channels to pay networks and broadcast stations severely cut staff and budgets for news and public affairs programming," Commisso said.

The veteran cable executive is also upset with the way cable programmers bundle their popular and unpopular channel together so distributors have to carry them all on the most widely distributed programming tiers.

"Subscribers are forced to pay for channels they do not want," Commisso told the FCC.

Commisso said the growing cost of programming is hurting Genachowski's efforts to provide broadband to low-income homes and that a "digital divide" is being created as prices rise "beyond the means or more and more Americans."

Remedies Commisso pitched include designing an a la carte system that would give consumers more control over what channels they get. He also wants more transparency, including the ability to require broadcasters and cable networks to make public what they charge distributors to carry their channels.

"Right now I'm just a collection agency for the programming community," Commissio said in an interview. "We take the brunt of the criticism because we send the bill to the consumer."

Thank you Hollywood Reporter

Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Thursday, September 1, 2011

On Location: Another busy week for feature filming in L.A....

Feature film activity in Los Angeles continued to grow at a brisk pace, with on-location shoots for movies once again posting double-digit increases.

Filming for features generated 189 production days for the week ended Sunday, up 66% from the same time a year earlier, according to recently-released data from FilmL.A. Inc., which handles permits for film shoots on streets and noncertified soundstages in the city and unincorporated areas of the county.

Feature film activity was virtually flat in the first half of this year but has steadily grown in recent months. The category is up about 60% so far in the third quarter compared with a year earlier, according to FilmL.A. data.

The surge in feature filming last week led to an overall 6% increase in production days across all categories.

Projects fueling the increase range from obscure independent features to star-packed studio movies including "The Dark Knight Rises," the upcoming Batman sequel that recently moved production from Pittsburgh; "Savages," an Oliver Stone directed movie starring John Travolta about pot growers who battle the Mexican mafia; and "End of Watch," a crime drama starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Pena and Anna Kendrick.

Activity is expected to remain strong as two other high-profile movies get underway: "Argo," about the Iranian hostage crisis, starring and directed by Ben Affleck; and "The Gangster Squad," a star-packed period drama with Sean Penn, Josh Brolin and Emma Stone about the Los Angeles Police Department's anti-mafia unit in the 1940s and 1950s.

Both films received approval for state film tax credits under a program whose future is being debated in Sacramento. The state Senate is expected to vote next week on a bill to extend the credits beyond 2012, though it's unclear whether the final bill would extend the $100 million in annual funding for five years or just one.

In other sectors, television production, which has been nearly flat so far this quarter, generated 337 production days last week, down 11% from a year earlier. Filming for commercials accounted for 139 production days, up 4%.

This week's scheduled film shoots include those for the Judd Apatow comedy "This is Forty," which will film downtown; "Savages," which will be in Studio City; and the CBS TV show "The Mentalist," which is taking its crew to Palmdale.

Meanwhile, the reality TV series "Pit Bulls and Parolees" will set up in Castaic, in northern L.A. County.

Thank you Los Angeles Times


Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

PGA Predicts Quick Studio Approval of New 'p.g.a.' Mark...

In the wake of a Justice Department letter greenlighting the Producers Guild's new "p.g.a." credit designation, guild executive director Vance Van Petten tells The Hollywood Reporter that he's confident the designation will be adopted shortly by a majority of studios.
"With this letter, we will be able to close (agreements with) four studios imminently," Van Petten said in an interview.
The designation is intended to indicate that a motion picture producer has performed the functions of a producer on a project, as opposed to having received a vanity credit. Eligibility requires a "Produced by" credit and the credited producer having "performed a majority of the producing duties on the film," according to a PGA statement to THR explaining the designation.
The designation would follow a producer's name in the movie's credits, if he or she qualified, and desired the designation. In addition, said the guild, studios and distributors remain free to assign the credit to whomever they wish.
STORY: Producers Guild Will Continue to Nominate 10 Movies for Its Top Film Award
PGA presidents Hawk Koch and Mark Gordon said "We're extremely pleased that the U.S. Department of Justice has fully endorsed the Producers Guild's certification mark." The added, "The DOJ's critical decision clearly and definitively paves the way for swift adoption of the Producers' Mark, as there should be no further resistance from the motion picture studios to participate in the 'p.g.a.' certification program."
The PGA has sought to protect the "p.g.a." designation by filing for federal registration as a certification mark – a type of trademark indicating that the services were performed by a person meeting specified criteria.
Certification marks also – and more commonly – can be applied to goods. For instance, "Bluetooth" certifies that cell phones, headsets and other products comply with the necessary technical standards.
The guild received a Notice of Allowance from the Trademark Office, meaning that registration is all but automatic once the mark is in use.
A certification mark for use in motion picture credits is unusual, and perhaps unique. According to Van Petten, this approach was developed "because we had brilliant legal counsel," David Quinto of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.
Catherine Fisk, a law professor at UC Irvine and an expert on credit and attribution in entertainment, remarked "Screen credit is important in Hollywood's labor market and to consumers of Hollywood films. The success of the PGA's certification mark will ultimately depend on whether the PGA can develop an impartial and rigorous method for determining the contributions of producers."
Although the Producers Guild is not a union – unlike the similarly named Writers, Directors and Screen Actors Guilds – it's managed to adopt for producers one of the WGA's key functions for writers: namely, determining credits, at least for the purpose of qualifying for best picture nominations for the Academy Awards, Golden Globes and BAFTA Awards.
The guild explained that "the process for implementing the (p.g.a.) Producers' Mark follows the template laid down by the Guild's successful awards arbitration process, though with an accelerated timeline: eligibility determinations (are held) during a film's post-production process in order to determine the recipients of the Mark prior to the striking of the film's credits."
Following the receipt of a Notice of Credits from the relevant studio or distributor, Guild staff will invite credited producers to submit an eligibility form to receive the Mark, said the PGA. The form is similar to the eligibility forms submitted by producers for consideration for awards.
The process is similar in some respects to the WGA credit procedure.
Studios haven't yet agreed to the plan, and negotiations with one of the majors, Paramount, hung up over the studio's concerns that the designation might lead to antitrust liability – despite the fact that the designation is optional, isn't restricted to PGA members, and will only be granted to members if they meet the same criteria as any other producer.
In addition, Van Petten pointed out to THR that designations such as A.S.C. have been used in credits for many years after the names of members of the American Society of Cinematographers – a more restrictive designation, since only ASC members are eligible – yet without apparent antitrust concerns.
Another frequent designation is A.C.E., for members of the American Cinema Editors. Both organizations are professional societies open to personnel of a certain level of experience and distinction. They're not unions.
The Paramount objections led to another innovative move: the PGA sought a "business review letter" from the Department of Justice – essentially, an assurance that the DOJ sees no antitrust problem in the proposed approach.
Those letters are seldom granted – they've been issued at the rate of only about five per year in the past few years – and the use of such a letter in combination with a certification mark seems even rarer.
Rare or not, the PGA obtained one on Friday.
The letter, which was the first one issued this year, stated "the (Department of Justice) has no present intention to challenge the proposed use of the Guild's certification mark." Receipt of the letter led Van Petten to express his confidence that negotiations would now be successful with Paramount and three additional studios, which he didn't name.
Koch and Gorden said "We (believe) that the entire industry benefits from recognizing producers for their work."
The guild also noted in its statement to THR that it "believes that audiences deserve to know which producers, among an often-extensive list of credited individuals and teams, actually did the work."
At present, the p.g.a. mark is only applicable to theatrical motion pictures, although television use is under consideration.
The official description of the mark, as reflected in the guild's trademark filing, is "The certification mark, as intended to be used by authorized persons, is intended to certify that an individual identified as a producer on the credits of a motion picture, television or cable show has satisfied the certifier's standards to qualify for a production credit and is thus is recognized as a producer eligible to be nominated for and to receive an award in connection with the individual's work on such motion picture, television or cable show."

Thank you Hollywood Reporter


Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

A new appeals decision on recording police in public

We thought this would be of interest - a good decision!

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

People have a clearly established right to film the police in public as long as they do so peacefully and do not interfere with officers‚ duties, a federal appeals court has ruled.

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/1st-circuit-people-can-record-police-performing-duties-in-public



Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

American Film Market Considering Big Move From Santa Monica to Downtown L.A.

The move from the Loews hotel to the L.A. Live complex, which must be voted on by the IFTA board, would likely take place in 2013.

The annual American Film Market is exploring a move from Santa Monica to the L.A. Live complex in downtown Los Angeles, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.
The AFM, one of the world's largest film markets, is run by the Independent Film & Television Alliance. Its contract with the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel, which has been headquarters for the market, conference and screenings since 1991, ends after the 2012 event. Apparently the Loews asked for an increase in the rates it charges, which is part of the reason the AFM started to look at other options.

Sources tell THR that Anschutz Entertainment Group, which manages the L.A. Live complex, has stepped in with an offer at a much lower cost than the Loews bid. Loews is said to have made a counteroffer earlier this week to try and retain the nearly two-week-long event, which each fall attracts more than 8,000 people involved in the independent production and distribution of movies from over 70 countries. IFTA estimates more than $800 million in transactions are done at the market on both competed films and pre-sales of movies in development.
A spokesman for IFTA and the AFM declined to comment.

This year's event, scheduled to run Nov. 2-9, would not be affected, nor would the 2012 AFM likely be impacted. The 2013 event would likely be the first to move downtown, though a deal could possibly be worked out to move the 2012 event as well.
The IFTA board must still approve any move. Sources say the board is expected to discuss the proposal on Tuesday during a conference call.
IFTA, the nonprofit that organizes and runs the AFM, reported 2009 income of about $11.5 million (of which $8.2 million came from running the market), and total assets of over $22.5 million, according to tax filings.

Founded in 1981, the AFM was first held at the Westwood Marquis Hotel, moved to the Hyatt on Sunset Strip, then shifted in 1986 to the Beverly Hilton. During the five years it was held in Beverly Hills, market screenings were mostly held at the Beverly Center.
When it moved to Santa Monica, the AFM helped launch the then-new Loews, as well as the city's Third Street Promenade, where last year nearly two dozen screens were used to show about 400 market movies at area theaters.

As it has grown over the years, some events have been farmed out to other hotels and restaurants in the area. In recent years, that has included the Le Merigot Beach Hotel, run by Marriott, which is next door to the Loews. Many of the conference events have been held at the nearby Fairmont Miramar Hotel. IFTA announced in June that the Miramar will be the site this fall for a new five-day AFM Conference Series (Nov. 4-8). It includes finance, production, marketing and distribution conferences, as well as an event where people pitch ideas for movies.
While the beachside Santa Monica location has strong appeal to international visitors, there are also issues of traffic, congestion and the high cost of retail and restaurants. Still, there is said to be some opposition to a move downtown from foreign participants who like the Westside location and are mostly unfamiliar with the urban areas of L.A.

In addition, since 2004, the AFM has had a relationship to the AFI Fest, put on by the American Film Institute. Most screenings for the festival are held at movie theaters in Hollywood, primarily those around the Hollywood & Highland complex, far away from the Santa Monica-based AFM. A move downtown would close the distance gap between AFM and AFI, which would be connected by L.A's subway system. The AFI Fest is not expected to move downtown, however.
AEG has been aggressive about trying to lure events to L.A. Live. The Independent Spirit Awards moved form their traditional Santa Monica beach location downtown for a year, but then moved back to the beach.
L.A. Live, which is adjacent to the Los Angeles Convention Center, has more than 5.6 million square feet of ballrooms, bars, restaurants, concert theaters, a condo tower and two large hotels in one tower. The sales suites could be in the hotels or they could be in the adjacent convention center.
There also is an 879-room JW Marriott Hotel on floors 4 through 21 and a 123-room Ritz Carlton Hotel on floors 22 through 26.
For screenings, the complex includes a multiplex operated by the Regal Entertainment Group. It has 14 screens and 3,772 seats and a three-story art deco style atrium. One theater, known as the Regal Premiere House, which has 806 seats, has been marketed for movie premieres but so far has had only limited success in attracting Hollywood downtown.
L.A. Live also includes the Nokia Theater (7,100 seats) and Club Nokia (2,300 seats), most often used as a venue for live music.
Most recently, AEG has been promoting plans to build a new stadium on the site to be called Farmers Field. It is intended to be home to a NFL football team. The LA City Council has tentatively approved the plan, but it has many hurdles ahead before it will actually be built, a process that could take years more.

Thank you Hollywood Reporter


Have a great day ☼
------------------------------------------------------ --> Submit to: In order to avoid all the SCAMS, we decide not to publish all the info of the recruter in the job postings. You'll find the Daily Password in our Monthly Newsletter. You can Subscribe to our Newsletter here Thanks. A. www.chicas-productions.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> Translate post:
Share

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more